Eury v. Knight

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 30, 2001
• Docket: 01-7464
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7464

MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

M. KNIGHT, sued in individual capacity; HILL, sued in individual capacity; PRINCE, sued in individual capacity; MCINTIRE; ALEXANDER, sued in individual capacity; VICK, sued in indi- vidual capacity; RIVERS, sued in individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-93-2)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 30, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West

Supp. 2001) complaint. The court dismissed Eury’s complaint be-

cause he failed to comply with an order directing him to submit an

adequate number of copies of the complaint. Because Eury may

proceed with this action by supplying an adequate number of copies

of the complaint, the order in question is not a final, appealable

order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10

F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED