Europa Realty LLC v. Inserra
This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 31024(U) (Europa Realty LLC v. Inserra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Europa Realty LLC v Inserra 2026 NY Slip Op 31024(U) March 18, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152003/2022 Judge: Emily Morales-Minerva Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1520032022.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/25/2026 3:45:46 PM] INDEX NO. 152003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 42M
X EUROPA REALTY LLC INDEX NO. 152003/2022
Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 08/29/2025 - V -
LAWRENCE INSERRA, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002
Defendant. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,42 were read on this motion to/for DISCOVERY
APPEARANCES:
Castro Law Group PLLC, New York, NY (Claude Castro, Esq., of counsel), for plaintiff.
PEM Law LLP, West Orange, NJ (Leonard Salvatore Spinelli, Esq., of counsel), for defendant.
EMILY MORALES-MINERVA, J.S.C.
In this action, defendant LAWRENCE INSERRA moves, by notice
of motion (sequence number 002), for an order pursuant to
CPLR § 3124 1 compelling plaintiff EUROPA REALTY LLC to respond to
defendant's discovery demands within 30 days. Defendant further
requests an order striking the complaint in the event plaintiff
fails to comply with those demands.
1 CPLR § 3124 provides, "If a person fails to respond to or comply with any request, notice, interrogatory, demand, question or order under this article, except a notice to admit under section 3123, the party seeking disclosure may move to compel compliance or a response." 152003/2022 EUROPA REALTY LLC vs. lNSERRA JR., LAWRENCE Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 002
[* 1] 1 of 4 INDEX NO. 152003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
Plaintiff does not oppose the branch of the motion seeking
to compel discovery responses to the discovery demands, but
opposes the request to strike the complaint if responses are not
served by a specified deadline.
CPLR § 3101 {a) generally governs disclosure, directing
that "[t]here shall be full disclosure of all matter material
and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action,
regardless of the burden of proof" {emphasis added). The
"'statute embodies the policy determination that liberal
discovery encourages fair and effective resolution of disputes
on the merits, minimizing the possibility for ambush and unfair
surprise'" {Forman v Henkin, 30 NY3d 656, 661 [2018], quoting
Spectrum Sys. Intl. Corp. v Chemical Bank, 78 NY2d 371, 376
[1991] ) .
Accordingly, our governing Court of Appeals has long
"emphasized that '[t]he words, "material and necessary",
are . . . to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure,
upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will
assist preparation for the trial by sharpening the issues and
reducing delay and prolixity. The test is one of usefulness and
reason" {Forman v Henkin, 30 NY3d 656, 661 [2018], quoting Allen
v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406, [1968], citing
Andon v 302 304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 NY2d 740, 746 [2000]).
152003/2022 EUROPA REALTY LLC vs. lNSERRA JR., LAWRENCE Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 002
[* 2] 2 of 4 INDEX NO. 152003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
"If a person f a1'l s to respond to or comply with any
request, notice, interrogatory, demand, question or order [for
discovery] the party seeking disclosure may move to compel
compliance or a response" {CPLR § 3124). Where the failure or
refusal to comply with a disclosure order exists, the "court may
make such orders . . . as are just," including "prohibiting the
disobedient party from producing in evidence designated things
or items of testimony [] or from using certain witnesses" {see
CPLR § 3126 [2]). However, "the court must determine that the
party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was willful,
deliberate and contumacious" before invoking the drastic remedy
of preclusion pursuant to CPLR § 3126 (2) (Holliday v Jones, 36
AD3d 557, 558 [1st Dept 2007], citing Vatel v City of New York,
208 AD2d 524 [2d Dept 1994]).
Defendant's request for an order·pursuant to CPLR § 3124
compelling plaintiff to respond to defendant's document demands
and interrogatories served on April 23, 2025, is granted.
However, defendant has not demonstrated a pattern of plaintiff's
willful non-compliance with discovery -- particularly in the
absence of any prior court order directing plaintiff to respond
by a certain date. Therefore, the Court declines to strike the
complaint in the event plaintiff fails to meet this
court-ordered deadline. Instead, the parties shall appear for a
preliminary conference on May 20, 2026, at 11:00 A.M. 152003/2022 EUROPA REALTY LLC vs. lNSERRA JR., LAWRENCE Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 002
[* 3] 3 of 4 INDEX NO. 152003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendant's motion (seq. no. 02) is granted,
in part, to the extent that plaintiff shall respond to
defendant's document demands and interrogatories served on April
23, 2025, by no later than April 30, 2026; it is further
ORDERED that defendant's motion (seq. no. 02) is otherwise
denied; it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a preliminary
conference in Part 42M, Courtroom 574, 111 Centre Street on May
20, 2026, at 11:00 A.M.; it is further
ORDERED that, within ten days from the date of this
decision and order, defendant shall serve a copy of this order,
with notice of entry, on plaintiff; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the file
accordingly.
3/18/2026 DATE ~~~w
~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
152003/2022 EUROPA REALTY LLC vs. lNSERRA JR., LAWRENCE Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 002
[* 4] 4 of 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 NY Slip Op 31024(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/europa-realty-llc-v-inserra-nysupctnewyork-2026.