Eurodif S.A. v. United States
This text of 89 F. App'x 236 (Eurodif S.A. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Eurodif S.A. et al. (Eurodif), the Ad Hoc Utilities Group (AHUG), and USEC, Inc. et al. (USEC) jointly petition for permission to appeal orders certified by the Court of International Trade as involving controlling questions of law as to which there are substantial grounds for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(1). The United States does not oppose, and petitions for permission to appeal. Eurodif, AHUG and USEC do not oppose the United States’ petition and submit a cross-petition.
The Court of International Trade identified four issues that may affect several cases pending at that court.
This court determines for itself whether it will grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order certified by a trial court. See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation, 903 F.2d 822 (Fed.Cir. 1990). Such a ruling is within this court’s complete discretion. Id. In this case, the circumstances warrant granting the petitions.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The petitions for permission to appeal are granted.
We note that, ultimately, we review the certified orders and not merely the issues that are stated by the Court of International Trade. See Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199, 205, 116 S.Ct. 619, 133 L.Ed.2d 578 (1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eurodif-sa-v-united-states-cafc-2004.