Eurodif S.A. v. United States

89 F. App'x 236
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2004
DocketMisc. Nos. 752, 753
StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. App'x 236 (Eurodif S.A. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 89 F. App'x 236 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Eurodif S.A. et al. (Eurodif), the Ad Hoc Utilities Group (AHUG), and USEC, Inc. et al. (USEC) jointly petition for permission to appeal orders certified by the Court of International Trade as involving controlling questions of law as to which there are substantial grounds for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(1). The United States does not oppose, and petitions for permission to appeal. Eurodif, AHUG and USEC do not oppose the United States’ petition and submit a cross-petition.

The Court of International Trade identified four issues that may affect several cases pending at that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Calhoun
516 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1996)
In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation
903 F.2d 822 (Federal Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eurodif-sa-v-united-states-cafc-2004.