Euriell M. Laidler v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Euriell M. Laidler v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2016

Docket15-2531

StatusPublished

This text of Euriell M. Laidler v. State of Florida (Euriell M. Laidler v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Euriell M. Laidler v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

EURIELL M. LAIDLER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-2531

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Euriell M. Laidler, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI