Eureka Springs v. Woodruff
19 S.W. 15, 55 Ark. 616, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 74
This text of 19 S.W. 15 (Eureka Springs v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eureka Springs v. Woodruff, 19 S.W. 15, 55 Ark. 616, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 74 (Ark. 1892).
Opinion
The vote on the question of annexation, not having been taken on the day of the annual election for city officers, was unauthorized, and did not warrant the proceeding in the county court upon the petition of the city. Vogel v. Little Rock, ante, p. 609.
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 S.W. 15, 55 Ark. 616, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eureka-springs-v-woodruff-ark-1892.