Eureka Coal Co. v. Powers

11 Ill. App. 81, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 8
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eureka Coal Co. v. Powers. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Ill. App. 61
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 31, 1882·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this ease it is claimed by counsel that this court treated a similar agreement as the one in question in the case of McKenney v. The Wilmington Star Mining Co. 7 Bradwell, 390, as being part of the record. We did so treat' the agreement in that case because it was made so by a bill of exceptions duly signed by the judge, but in this case there is no bill of exceptions and the agreement is no part of the record. The fact that the supposed agreement states that it is to be made a part of the record, can make no difference. It is no part of the record unless made so by proper bill of exceptions, without which we can not judicially know that it exists.

The motion for a rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eureka Coal Co. v. Powers, 11 Ill. App. 81, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 8 (Ill. Ct. App. 1882).

11 Ill. App. 81 (Eureka Coal Co. v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.