Eureka Cereal Beverage Co. v. Pennington
66 F.2d 1005, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2842
This text of 66 F.2d 1005 (Eureka Cereal Beverage Co. v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eureka Cereal Beverage Co. v. Pennington, 66 F.2d 1005, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2842 (3d Cir. 1933).
Opinion
Apart from the failure of the plaintiff in this hill to make the commissioner a party [see opinion of this court in Chamberlain v. Lembeck, 18 F.(2d) 408], the year covered by the permit here involved had expired before this case was argued before this court, and the questions involved were then academic.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chamberlain v. Lembeck
18 F.2d 408 (Third Circuit, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 F.2d 1005, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eureka-cereal-beverage-co-v-pennington-ca3-1933.