Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Grays Harbor County
This text of 211 P. 273 (Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Grays Harbor County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-This is a companion case to that of Grays Harbor Lumber Co. v. Grays Harbor County, ante p. 625, 211 Pac. 270. The plaintiff seeks relief from an alleged fraudulently excessive valu[699]*699ation of its personal property for taxation purposes and the taxes levied thereon, from an alleged double assessment of machinery, etc., in its sawmill and from alleged unlawful levies on behalf of the city of Hoquiam. By stipulation, the two cases were tried together, the testimony to be considered in each of the cases as it was found to be applicable thereto. The relief granted in this case was similar in character to that granted in the other and here as there the county and its officers have appealed. The plaintiff has taken a cross-appeal, and the city of Hoquiam has not appealed.
The pleadings, proof, judgment, assignments of error and arguments in this case are, on principle, essentially the same as those found in the other case. Upon the authority of the other ease and for the reasons therein given, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Parker, C. J., Holcomb, Bridges, and Mackintosh, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 P. 273, 122 Wash. 698, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eureka-cedar-lumber-shingle-co-v-grays-harbor-county-wash-1922.