Eurasia Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Eurasia Corp. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 245, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1003

United States Customs Court·Decided September 3, 1953·No. No. 57476; protest 192467-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

When this case was called for trial, the official papers were admitted in evidence, and it was agreed that the one bale of hats in question was withdrawn from warehouse on March 31, 1949. The collector’s report states that the merchandise would now be properly classified as claimed by the plaintiff. Upon the facts established by the record, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

When this case was called for trial, the official papers were admitted in evidence, and it was agreed that the one bale of hats in question was withdrawn from warehouse on March 31, 1949. The collector’s report states that the merchandise would now be properly classified as claimed by the plaintiff. Upon the facts established by the record, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Eurasia Corp. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 245, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1003 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

31 Cust. Ct. 245 (Eurasia Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.