Eunice P. Boyce v. United States
This text of 296 F.2d 731 (Eunice P. Boyce v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
296 F.2d 731
Eunice P. BOYCE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19002.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
December 21, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Ben C. Dawkins, Jr., Judge.
Shelton W. Boyce, Jr., Houston, Tex., Simon Herold, Shreveport, La., for appellant.
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., T. Fitzhugh Wilson, U. S. Atty., Shreveport, La., Daniel K. Mayers, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Meyer Rothwacks, William A. Friedlander, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Finding ourselves in substantial agreement with the opinion of the learned district judge reported in 190 F.Supp. 950, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 F.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eunice-p-boyce-v-united-states-ca5-1961.