Eunice Janousek v. Effie D. Chatterton

D.C. Circuit

Eunice Janousek v. Effie D. Chatterton

317 F.2d 594

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 1963

Docket17034

StatusPublished

This text of 317 F.2d 594 (Eunice Janousek v. Effie D. Chatterton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eunice Janousek v. Effie D. Chatterton, 317 F.2d 594 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing appellant’s motion to intervene and to add a party defendant in Civil Action No. 796-59 on the dockets of that court.

The District Court ruled that the motion to intervene “[did] not present a *595 matter of right in accordance with Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that to grant such motion on basis of Rule 24(b) would unduly delay the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.”

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing appellant’s motion to intervene and to add a party defendant in Civil Action No. 796-59 on the dockets of that court.

The District Court ruled that the motion to intervene “[did] not present a *595 matter of right in accordance with Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that to grant such motion on basis of Rule 24(b) would unduly delay the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.”

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 F.2d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eunice-janousek-v-effie-d-chatterton-cadc-1963.