Eun Ju Jegal-Kim v. Holder
This text of 376 F. App'x 743 (Eun Ju Jegal-Kim v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Eun Ju Jegal-Kim, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
The agency properly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Jegal-Kim’s application for a U Visa. See Ramirez Sanchez v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1254, 1255-56 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has sole jurisdiction over the issuance of U Visa petitions); see also Lee v. Holder, 599 F.3d 973 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam).
Jegal-Kim’s remaining contention is not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 F. App'x 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eun-ju-jegal-kim-v-holder-ca9-2010.