Eulalio Torres-Resendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

445 F. App'x 9
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 2011
Docket10-70076
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 445 F. App'x 9 (Eulalio Torres-Resendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eulalio Torres-Resendez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 445 F. App'x 9 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eulalio Torres-Resendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Torres-Resendez’s motion to reopen on the ground that the presented medical documentation was insufficient to establish Torres-Resendez had a “reasonable cause” for failing to attend his hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) (1982), Matter of Haim, 19 I. & N. Dec. 641, 642 (BIA 1988) (alien must demonstrate through affidavits or other evidentiary material he had a “reasonable cause” for failing to appear).

Torres-Resendez’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 F. App'x 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eulalio-torres-resendez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.