Eulala Shute, and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines
This text of 934 F.2d 1091 (Eulala Shute, and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eulala SHUTE, and Russel Shute, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-4063.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 10, 1991.
Gregory J. Wall, Brousseau, Wall & Jankovich, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Jonathan Rodriguez-Atkatz, Bogle & Gates, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 F.2d 1091, 91 Daily Journal DAR 6730, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eulala-shute-and-russel-shute-v-carnival-cruise-lines-ca9-1991.