Eugster v. Eugster

102 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 594, 3 Stock. 594, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eugster v. Eugster. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 N.J. Eq. 531
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1918·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tbe opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eugster v. Eugster, 102 A. 1053, 88 N.J. Eq. 594, 3 Stock. 594, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1918).

102 A. 1053 (Eugster v. Eugster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.