Eugenio Sanchez Bernal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

444 F. App'x 926
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2011·No. 11-1424·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Eugenio Sanchez Bernal petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Bernal did not meet his burden of demonstrating he was continuously physically present in the United States for ten years before he was served with a notice to appear. See Sanchez-Velasco v. Holder, 593 F.3d 733, 735-36 (8th Cir.2010) (standards of review); Acevedo-Aguilar v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 8, 10 (1st Cir.2008) (holding substantial evidence supported denial of cancellation of removal where alien’s testimony was inconsistent with other evidence in record regarding relevant dates). *927 Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eugenio Sanchez Bernal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 444 F. App'x 926 (8th Cir. 2011).

444 F. App'x 926 (Eugenio Sanchez Bernal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acevedo-Aguilar v. Mukasey
517 F.3d 8 (First Circuit, 2008)
Sanchez-Velasco v. Holder
593 F.3d 733 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)