Eugenio Espinoza Martinez v. Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez
This text of Eugenio Espinoza Martinez v. Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez (Eugenio Espinoza Martinez v. Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00791-CV
Eugenio Espinoza Martinez, Appellant
v.
Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 12-1114-F425, HONORABLE MARK J. SILVERSTONE, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellee Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez has notified this Court that the divorce
decree in the underlying cause should be reversed because Eugenio Espinoza Martinez did not
receive adequate notice of the final hearing.
We abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a hearing and
findings about whether Eugenio Espinoza Martinez received adequate notice of the final hearing.
A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and the reporter’s record of the
hearing shall be filed no later than August 26, 2013.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Rose
Abated
Filed: June 27, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eugenio Espinoza Martinez v. Kathleen Anne Lozano Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugenio-espinoza-martinez-v-kathleen-anne-lozano-martinez-texapp-2013.