Eugenio Duquesne v. Mike Easley, Attorney General, North Carolina E. Lynn Johnston North Carolina Department of Justice

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23396, 1995 WL 373272
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 1995
Docket95-6245
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 166 (Eugenio Duquesne v. Mike Easley, Attorney General, North Carolina E. Lynn Johnston North Carolina Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugenio Duquesne v. Mike Easley, Attorney General, North Carolina E. Lynn Johnston North Carolina Department of Justice, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23396, 1995 WL 373272 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Eugenio DUQUESNE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mike EASLEY, Attorney General, North Carolina; E. Lynn
Johnston; North Carolina Department of Justice,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6245.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Duquesne v. Easley, No. CA-94-1002-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's request for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23396, 1995 WL 373272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugenio-duquesne-v-mike-easley-attorney-general-no-ca4-1995.