Eugene Walker v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Eugene Walker v. United States

342 F.2d 800, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6045

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 1965

Docket22025_1

StatusPublished

This text of 342 F.2d 800 (Eugene Walker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eugene Walker v. United States, 342 F.2d 800, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6045 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 wherein appellant contends that his indictment charging violations of 26 U.S.C.A. § 4705(a) was defective for failure to specify the person to whom unlawful sales of narcotics were made. This contention was settled adversely to appellant in Jackson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 210, and Borroto v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 60.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 wherein appellant contends that his indictment charging violations of 26 U.S.C.A. § 4705(a) was defective for failure to specify the person to whom unlawful sales of narcotics were made. This contention was settled adversely to appellant in Jackson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 210, and Borroto v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 60.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 F.2d 800, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-walker-v-united-states-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack