Eugene v. State
This text of 828 So. 2d 1055 (Eugene v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeffrey EUGENE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
On June 20, 2001, we affirmed appellant's convictions on the authority of Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). On July 10, 2001, we stayed issuance of the mandate pending the supreme court's review of Hall.
Based on Hall v. State, 826 So.2d 268 (Fla.2002), we reverse appellant's convictions for grand theft and dealing in stolen property. A trial judge is prohibited "from adjudicating a defendant guilty of both theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere." Id. at 271.
Appellant's motion for rehearing is granted and the case is remanded to the circuit court for resentencing.
POLEN, C.J., STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
828 So. 2d 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.