Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 6, 2013·No. 01-12-01090-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-01090-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 1137680 Style: Eugene V. McMahon v Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP Date motion filed*: 8/14/2013 Appellants's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Refile Brief to Cure Procedural Type of motion: Defects in Civil Case Party filing motion: Eugene McMahon Document to be filed: Appellant's amended brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: 8/13/2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Date Requested: No specific date requested - instead requested "sufficient time" to allow filing of supplemental Clerk's Record and amend brief.

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: File amended brief by October 2, 2013 or 10 days after supplemental record is received, whichever is sooner. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: September 6, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP (Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.