Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-01090-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 1137680 Style: Eugene V. McMahon v Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP Date motion filed*: 8/14/2013 Appellants's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Refile Brief to Cure Procedural Type of motion: Defects in Civil Case Party filing motion: Eugene McMahon Document to be filed: Appellant's amended brief
Is appeal accelerated? Yes No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: 8/13/2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Date Requested: No specific date requested - instead requested "sufficient time" to allow filing of supplemental Clerk's Record and amend brief.
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: File amended brief by October 2, 2013 or 10 days after supplemental record is received, whichever is sooner. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other:
Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually Acting for the Court
Panel consists of
Date: September 6, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP (Eugene v. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.