Eugene Tidwell v. State
This text of Eugene Tidwell v. State (Eugene Tidwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 26, 2016
No. 04-16-00449-CR
Eugene TIDWELL, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR4975 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding
ORDER The reporter’s record was due August 15, 2016. On August 23, 2016, court reporter Kay Gittinger filed a request for an extension of thirty days from August 23 to file the record. We grant the motion in part and order Kay Gittinger to file the reporter’s record by September 14, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c) (stating court of appeals must not grant an extension exceeding thirty days in an ordinary appeal).
_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of August, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eugene Tidwell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-tidwell-v-state-texapp-2016.