Eugene Segura v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 2008
Docket13-07-00725-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Eugene Segura v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company (Eugene Segura v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugene Segura v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00725-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

EUGENE SEGURA, Appellant,

v.

H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY, Appellee. _____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Eugene Segura, appealed a judgment rendered against him in the 197th

District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On January 18, 2008, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on January

7, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this

Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if

it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s

notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to comply

with the appellate rules, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s directive, is of the

opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the

appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 10th day of April, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eugene Segura v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-segura-v-h-e-butt-grocery-company-texapp-2008.