Eugene S. Myer v. Coleman Holley
This text of 940 F.2d 652 (Eugene S. Myer v. Coleman Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
940 F.2d 652
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eugene S. MYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Coleman HOLLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-7115.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 15, 1991.
Decided Aug. 15, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-90-2092-JH)
Eugene S. Myer, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Eugene S. Myer appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Myer v. Holley, CA-90-2092-JH (D.Md. May 9, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
940 F.2d 652, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23465, 1991 WL 154346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-s-myer-v-coleman-holley-ca4-1991.