Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

196 F.2d 221, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2441
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 14, 1952·No. 22330·Published

Opinion

196 F.2d 221

Eugene McCARTY, Libellant-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellant, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee.

No. 245.

Docket 22330.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 14, 1952.

Decided May 14, 1952.

On appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Frank J. Parker, U. S. Atty. for Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., Dorsey, Burke & Keber, New York City (James F. Hart, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

John P. Smith, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Leo F. Hanan, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-impleaded-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree, D.C., 88 F.Supp. 251, affirmed in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee, 196 F.2d 221, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2441 (2d Cir. 1952).

196 F.2d 221 (Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarty v. United States
88 F. Supp. 251 (E.D. New York, 1950)