Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

Second Circuit

Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

196 F.2d 221, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2441

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1952

Docket22330

StatusPublished

This text of 196 F.2d 221 (Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eugene McCarty Libellant-Appellee v. United States of America, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee, 196 F.2d 221, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2441 (2d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

196 F.2d 221

Eugene McCARTY, Libellant-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellant, Guardino & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee.

No. 245.

Docket 22330.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 14, 1952.

Decided May 14, 1952.

On appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Frank J. Parker, U. S. Atty. for Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., Dorsey, Burke & Keber, New York City (James F. Hart, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

John P. Smith, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Leo F. Hanan, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-impleaded-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree, D.C., 88 F.Supp. 251, affirmed in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI