Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force v. Raymond H. Peterson

321 F.2d 748, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 135, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4985
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1963
Docket17560
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 321 F.2d 748 (Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force v. Raymond H. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force v. Raymond H. Peterson, 321 F.2d 748, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 135, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4985 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee [plaintiff] in this action seeks restoration to his former GS-9 position in the Department of the Air Force. Having been given notice of intention to remove him from his position for performance deficiencies, he duly filed a written reply. After being notified of the final decision to remove him, he requested review through the Air Force Grievance Procedure, which was granted. Thereafter, he was notified that removal was warranted, but that, due to mitigating circumstances, he could accept a lower grade (GS-4) instead of removal. Although advised of his right to seek further review by the Major Air Command, he, on September 6,1957, accepted change to the lower grade.

The present action was not instituted until September 15, 1961, more than four years after the termination of the administrative proceedings. After intermediate proceedings appellee filed motion for summary judgment, which was granted by the District Court on October 15, 1962. This appeal followed.

We think this case is governed in all respects by Jones v. Summerfield, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 140, 265 F.2d 124 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 841, 80 S.Ct. 93, 4 L.Ed.2d 80, and that the District Court was in error in granting motion for summary judgment for appellee when his claim was plainly barred by laches.

The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further action on the issue of laches in light of Jones v. Summerfield, supra.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Scott
329 A.2d 442 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 F.2d 748, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 135, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-m-zuckert-secretary-of-the-air-force-v-raymond-h-peterson-cadc-1963.