Eugene M. Bazaar v. Porter Fortune

489 F.2d 225, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6635
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 6, 1973·No. 72-2175·Published·Cited by 35 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the record, briefs and oral argument in this cause en banc, the court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the panel should be and the same are hereby affirmed, subject to the following modification :

The defendants-appellants may, at their option, place or stamp on the cover or the format of the magazine Images the following disclaimer {in haec ver-ba) : “This is not an official publication of the University.” 1

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eugene M. Bazaar v. Porter Fortune, 489 F.2d 225, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6635 (5th Cir. 1973).

489 F.2d 225 (Eugene M. Bazaar v. Porter Fortune) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hosty v. Carter
325 F.3d 945 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Leeb v. DeLong
198 Cal. App. 3d 47 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
American Council of the Blind v. Boorstin
644 F. Supp. 811 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Bailey v. Loggins
654 P.2d 758 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission
688 F.2d 1033 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Reineke v. Cobb County School District
484 F. Supp. 1252 (N.D. Georgia, 1980)
Bayou Landing, Ltd. v. Watts
563 F.2d 1172 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Gambino v. Fairfax County School Board
429 F. Supp. 731 (E.D. Virginia, 1977)
Schiff v. Williams
519 F.2d 257 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Oxfeld v. New Jersey State Board of Education
344 A.2d 769 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
The Luparar v. Stoneman
382 F. Supp. 495 (D. Vermont, 1974)