Eugene Hubble v. John Duncan, Warden, Fred Cowan, Attorney General

887 F.2d 265, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15800, 1989 WL 120800
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1989
Docket89-6173
StatusUnpublished

This text of 887 F.2d 265 (Eugene Hubble v. John Duncan, Warden, Fred Cowan, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugene Hubble v. John Duncan, Warden, Fred Cowan, Attorney General, 887 F.2d 265, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15800, 1989 WL 120800 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

887 F.2d 265

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Eugene HUBBLE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
John DUNCAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee,
Fred Cowan, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 89-6173.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1989.

Before KEITH, MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed from an order denying bail prior to the district court's ruling on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus proceeding. Such an order is not appealable but the notice of appeal may be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Woodcock v. Donnelly, 470 F.2d 93, 94 (1st Cir.1972) (per curiam). The remedy of mandamus is a drastic one to be invoked only in extraordinary situations where the petitioner can show a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. Will v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co., 437 U.S. 655, 662 (1978). Such an indisputable right to bail has not been shown in the instant case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Treating the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus, such petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
887 F.2d 265, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15800, 1989 WL 120800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-hubble-v-john-duncan-warden-fred-cowan-attorney-general-ca6-1989.