Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles
394 U.S. 102, 89 S. Ct. 926, 22 L. Ed. 2d 112, 22 L. Ed. 2d 120, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2377
This text of 394 U.S. 102 (Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles, 394 U.S. 102, 89 S. Ct. 926, 22 L. Ed. 2d 112, 22 L. Ed. 2d 120, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2377 (1969).
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates
579 F. Supp. 36 (C.D. California, 1984)
Alfone v. Sarno
403 A.2d 9 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
United States v. Robert Edward Johnson
476 F.2d 1251 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. William Marshal Grans
472 F.2d 597 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James Adam Wood
454 F.2d 765 (Fourth Circuit, 1972)
Grabinger v. Conlisk
320 F. Supp. 1213 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Meyer v. Austin
319 F. Supp. 457 (M.D. Florida, 1970)
United States v. Stephen R. Evans
425 F.2d 302 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Hosmer
310 F. Supp. 1166 (D. Maine, 1970)
Miller v. State of California
6 Cal. App. 3d 202 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
United States v. Thomas Owen Norman, Jr.
413 F.2d 789 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
394 U.S. 102, 89 S. Ct. 926, 22 L. Ed. 2d 112, 22 L. Ed. 2d 120, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-holden-v-roger-arnebergh-city-attorney-los-angeles-scotus-1969.