Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.

108 A.D.2d 1004, 485 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43331
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 A.D.2d 1004 (Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co., 108 A.D.2d 1004, 485 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cobb, J.), entered December 13, 1983 in Ulster County, which granted defendant Phil-Mar Lumber Corporation’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered against it.

Following service of a summons and complaint upon the Secretary of State pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 306, plaintiff entered a default judgment against defendant Phil-Mar Lumber Corporation (Phil-Mar). Phil-Mar moved to vacate the default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) alleging (1) that its default was excusable in that it did not receive the papers served upon the Secretary of State in time to defend the action, since the address filed with that office was not current for forwarding purposes, and (2) that it had a meritorious defense. Special Term granted Phil-Mar’s motion and this appeal ensued.

In Cristo Bros. v Cristo, Inc. (91 AD2d 807, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 760, lv dismissed 60 NY2d 554), we held that corporations are obligated to keep a current address on file with the Secretary of State and the failure to receive copies of process served upon the Secretary of State due to a breach of this obligation will not constitute a “reasonable excuse” for a corporation seeking to vacate a default under CPLR 5015 (a) (1). Here, Phil-Mar had a default judgment entered against it on a prior occasion due to its failure to file its current address with the Secretary of State.

Order reversed, on the law, with costs, defendant Phil-Mar Lumber Corporation’s motion denied, and default judgment reinstated. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latham Sparrowbush Associates. v. Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc.
114 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A.D.2d 1004, 485 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-di-lorenzo-inc-v-a-c-dutton-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1985.