Eugene Corrao v. Catherine Gunzbourg-Gurney and Maxim J. Gurney
254 F.2d 351, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 14, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014
This text of 254 F.2d 351 (Eugene Corrao v. Catherine Gunzbourg-Gurney and Maxim J. Gurney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eugene Corrao v. Catherine Gunzbourg-Gurney and Maxim J. Gurney, 254 F.2d 351, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 14, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
Opinion
A jury found in effect, after a hearing, that an alleged testator who put his signature nowhere except on two amended pages of carbon copies did not intend thereby to execute a will. Judgment was entered accordingly. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
254 F.2d 351, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 14, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-corrao-v-catherine-gunzbourg-gurney-and-maxim-j-gurney-cadc-1958.