Eugene Barber v. Department of Agriculture
This text of 22 F.3d 1103 (Eugene Barber v. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
22 F.3d 1103
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Eugene BARBER, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.
No. 94-3170.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 4, 1994.
MSPB
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is
ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F.3d 1103, 1994 WL 78059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-barber-v-department-of-agriculture-cafc-1994.