Eugene B. Smith v. State of Florida, Florida Secretary of Corrections
This text of Eugene B. Smith v. State of Florida, Florida Secretary of Corrections (Eugene B. Smith v. State of Florida, Florida Secretary of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
EUGENE SMITH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D16-0193
STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
___________________________/
Opinion filed March 4, 2016.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.
Eugene Smith, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
Petitioner is warned that any future pleadings determined by this court to be
frivolous or successive may result in the imposition of sanctions against him, including
a prohibition against any future pro se appeals or petitions challenging the judgment and sentence in Okaloosa County Circuit court case number 2008-CF-0705 and a
referral to the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures pursuant
to the rules of the Department as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2015).
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
ROBERTS, C. J., MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eugene B. Smith v. State of Florida, Florida Secretary of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-b-smith-v-state-of-florida-florida-secretary-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2016.