Euell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Euell v. State

173 S.W. 1198, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 494, 1915 WL 52

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 1915·No. No. 3432·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

The appellant was convicted for rape of his own daughter, she being the age of between 13 and 14 years, and his punishment assessed at 59 years in the penitentiary. There is neither a bill of exceptions nor a statement of facts in the case. No question is raised in the motion for new trial, or otherwise, which can be reviewed in. the absence of these. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

The appellant was convicted for rape of his own daughter, she being the age of between 13 and 14 years, and his punishment assessed at 59 years in the penitentiary. There is neither a bill of exceptions nor a statement of facts in the case. No question is raised in the motion for new trial, or otherwise, which can be reviewed in. the absence of these. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Euell v. State, 173 S.W. 1198, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 494, 1915 WL 52 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

173 S.W. 1198 (Euell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.