Eubanks v. United States

405 F. App'x 796
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1412
StatusPublished

This text of 405 F. App'x 796 (Eubanks v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eubanks v. United States, 405 F. App'x 796 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eubanks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eubanks v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-00126-REM-DJJ, 2010 WL 1141437 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 F. App'x 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubanks-v-united-states-ca4-2010.