Eubanks v. Stocks
343 So. 2d 1352, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580
Opinion
Appellants, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal an order dismissing Counts I and II of their amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Our review reveals that the dismissed counts fail to allege recoverable damages. Further, even were recoverable damages alleged, the trial judge was eminently correct in determining that no cause of action was stated. (Please see Turvey v. Kulazenka, 341 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), wherein is cited Beagle v. Bagwell, 169 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eubanks v. Stocks, 343 So. 2d 1352, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
343 So. 2d 1352 (Eubanks v. Stocks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beagle v. Bagwell
169 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Turvey v. Kulazenka
341 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)