Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eubanks v. Stocks

Eubanks v. Stocks

343 So. 2d 1352, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1977
DocketNo. CC-129
StatusPublished

This text of 343 So. 2d 1352 (Eubanks v. Stocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eubanks v. Stocks, 343 So. 2d 1352, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal an order dismissing Counts I and II of their amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Our review reveals that the dismissed counts fail to allege recoverable damages. Further, even were recoverable damages alleged, the trial judge was eminently correct in determining that no cause of action was stated. (Please see Turvey v. Kulazenka, 341 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), wherein is cited Beagle v. Bagwell, 169 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beagle v. Bagwell
169 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Turvey v. Kulazenka
341 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 So. 2d 1352, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubanks-v-stocks-fladistctapp-1977.