Eubanks v. State
874 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2004 WL 1283779
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Windom v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S191, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 1057640 (Fla. May 6, 2004) (holding that in reviewing an order on a motion for post conviction relief, the trial court’s factual findings are to be given deference); see also Foster v. State, 810 So.2d 910 (Fla.2002) (holding that it is not necessary for a trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on claims raised in a post conviction motion that are facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eubanks v. State, 874 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2004 WL 1283779 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
874 So. 2d 1266 (Eubanks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foster v. State
810 So. 2d 910 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Windom v. State
886 So. 2d 915 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)