Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eubanks v. State

Eubanks v. State

874 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2004 WL 1283779
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-2278
StatusPublished

This text of 874 So. 2d 1266 (Eubanks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eubanks v. State, 874 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2004 WL 1283779 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Windom v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S191, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 1057640 (Fla. May 6, 2004) (holding that in reviewing an order on a motion for post conviction relief, the trial court’s factual findings are to be given deference); see also Foster v. State, 810 So.2d 910 (Fla.2002) (holding that it is not necessary for a trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on claims raised in a post conviction motion that are facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record).

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. State
810 So. 2d 910 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Windom v. State
886 So. 2d 915 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2004 WL 1283779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubanks-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.