Eubanks v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eubanks v. Johnson

231 A.D.2d 954, 648 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 954 (Eubanks v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eubanks v. Johnson, 231 A.D.2d 954, 648 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner, an inmate at Orleans Correctional Facility, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination, made after a Tier III hearing, that he violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]) by possessing contraband. He contends that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence because respondents failed to show that he had substantial control over the contraband. We disagree. The contraband, a metal rod, was found inside a laundry bag on the top shelf of a rack outside the laundry room of an inmate dorm unit. Although there is no proof that petitioner physically possessed the bag, he was one of three inmates who had access to the bag before it was seized by a correction officer. Further, minutes before the seizure, the officer saw petitioner reach for the bag but, upon observing that the officer was watching him, withdraw his hand and walk away. When the officer seized the bag and felt its contents, petitioner spontaneously said, "It’s not mine”. Under those circumstances, the evidence is sufficient to warrant a reasonable inference that he possessed the contraband inside the bag (cf., Matter of Torres v Coughlin, 213 AD2d 861; Matter of Price v Coughlin, 195 AD2d 995). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Punch, J.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner, an inmate at Orleans Correctional Facility, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination, made after a Tier III hearing, that he violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]) by possessing contraband. He contends that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence because respondents failed to show that he had substantial control over the contraband. We disagree. The contraband, a metal rod, was found inside a laundry bag on the top shelf of a rack outside the laundry room of an inmate dorm unit. Although there is no proof that petitioner physically possessed the bag, he was one of three inmates who had access to the bag before it was seized by a correction officer. Further, minutes before the seizure, the officer saw petitioner reach for the bag but, upon observing that the officer was watching him, withdraw his hand and walk away. When the officer seized the bag and felt its contents, petitioner spontaneously said, "It’s not mine”. Under those circumstances, the evidence is sufficient to warrant a reasonable inference that he possessed the contraband inside the bag (cf., Matter of Torres v Coughlin, 213 AD2d 861; Matter of Price v Coughlin, 195 AD2d 995). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Punch, J.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 954, 648 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubanks-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack