Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.
This text of 149 A.3d 980 (Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.
The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court incorrectly rendered judgment for the respondent on the petitioner's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to portions of the testimony of Tanika McCotter in a transcript admitted under the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, on the ground that they were 'double hearsay'?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubanks-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2016.