Eubanks v. Baker

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 7, 2024·No. 3:16-cv-00336·Unknown

Opinion

* * *

CHARLES SHEA EUBANKS, Case No. 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD

Petitioner, ORDER v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. Respondents filed a Motion for Leave to File Exhibit 261 in Camera and Under Seal. (ECF No. 83.) Under Nevada law, the PSI is “confidential and must not be made a part of any public record.” NRS § 176.156(5). Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, the Court finds that a compelling need to protect Petitioner’s safety, privacy, and/or personal identifying information outweighs the public interest in open access to court records. The motion to file under seal (ECF No. 83) is granted. Respondents also filed an Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request) (ECF No. 81) to comply with this Court’s order dated October 9, 2024 (ECF No. 78). Good cause appearing, the motion to extend time (ECF No. 81) is granted. Respondents have up to and including November 26, 2024, to comply with the Court’s order dated October 9, 2024. It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 83) is granted. It is further ordered that Exhibit No. 261 (ECF No. 84-1) remain under seal. /// /// 1 It is further ordered that Respondents’ Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request) (ECF No. 81) is granted. Respondents have up to and including November 26, 2024, to comply with this Court’s order dated October 9, 2024. DATED THIS 7" Day of November 2024.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eubanks v. Baker, (D. Nev. 2024).

Eubanks v. Baker (Eubanks v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)