Eubank v. People
50 Ill. 496
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
In this case the only judgment of forfeiture offered in evidence, as appears bv the bill of exceptions, was a mere memorandum by the clerk, which probably was a literal copy of the minutes of the judge. It does not even name the parties against whom this scire facias has issued. A valid judgment of forfeiture was set out in the scire facias, but it was not offered in evidence.
For want of a proper judgment of forfeiture, this judgment on the scire facias must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eubank v. People, 50 Ill. 496 (Ill. 1869).
50 Ill. 496 (Eubank v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western Surety Co. v. United States
72 F.2d 457 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
McGuire v. State
23 N.E. 85 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)