Eubank v. Ohio

302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 147
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 8, 1937
DocketNo. 509
StatusPublished

This text of 302 U.S. 646 (Eubank v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eubank v. Ohio, 302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 147 (1937).

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Smith v. Alabama, 124 U. S. 465, 480, [647]*647482; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114, 121, 122; Smith v. Texas, 233 U. S. 630, 636, 637; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 427.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellant. Mr. Herbert S. Duffy for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Alabama
124 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Dent v. West Virginia
129 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Smith v. Texas
233 U.S. 630 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Graves v. Minnesota
272 U.S. 425 (Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubank-v-ohio-scotus-1937.