Etue v. Department of Professional Regulation
This text of 524 So. 2d 1175 (Etue v. Department of Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final administrative order of the State Board of Accountancy except that we find the Board acted contrary to statutory directives in imposing an additional two years probation on appellant James Etue. We remand with directions that the final order be amended and the two year probation period be deleted. The fine recommended by the hearing officer may be reinstated by the Board, in the Board’s discretion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 So. 2d 1175, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1247, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2148, 1988 WL 50673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etue-v-department-of-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-1988.