Ettman v. Paroton Building Corp.

283 A.D. 897, 129 N.Y.S.2d 911

This text of 283 A.D. 897 (Ettman v. Paroton Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ettman v. Paroton Building Corp., 283 A.D. 897, 129 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment rescinding the lease of an apartment by plaintiff, the tenant, on the ground that its execution had been induced by defendant’s fraudulent representations that “day and night” doorman service would be furnished. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ. [See post, p. 1058.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 897, 129 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ettman-v-paroton-building-corp-nyappdiv-1954.