Ettman v. Paroton Building Corp.
This text of 283 A.D. 897 (Ettman v. Paroton Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment rescinding the lease of an apartment by plaintiff, the tenant, on the ground that its execution had been induced by defendant’s fraudulent representations that “day and night” doorman service would be furnished. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ. [See post, p. 1058.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 897, 129 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ettman-v-paroton-building-corp-nyappdiv-1954.