Ettinger v. Maas

Supreme Court of Florida

Ettinger v. Maas

120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 219, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 819

DecidedFebruary 19, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 334 (Ettinger v. Maas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ettinger v. Maas, 120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 219, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 819 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the plaintiffs in error were the defendants in the court below and, upon judgment being rendered against them, they sued out writ of error.

Pleas to the declaration (if any were filed) do not appear in the transcript of the record and, therefore, this Court is not advised of the issues presented in the trial of the cause. For this reason the Court is not in position to determine whether or not' reversible error occurred in the trial and judgment. *

When a record is presented in this condition the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

*220 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI