Ettinger v. Ettinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ettinger v. Ettinger

261 A.D. 962, 27 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 962 (Ettinger v. Ettinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ettinger v. Ettinger, 261 A.D. 962, 27 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendants from an order granting the plaintiff an examination of the defendants before trial. Order modified as follows: By striking out items 3 and 4 and inserting a new item numbered 2, reading, “ Whether the plaintiff pursuant to said agreement did from time to time turn over any sums to defendant Mary Ettinger.” By striking from item 7 the word “ such ” and substituting the word “ any.” By striking from item 8 the word “ various ” and substituting the word “ any.” By striking out item 11. As to items 1, 2, 5 and 9 the examination is limited to defendant Mary Ettinger. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendants from an order granting the plaintiff an examination of the defendants before trial. Order modified as follows: By striking out items 3 and 4 and inserting a new item numbered 2, reading, “ Whether the plaintiff pursuant to said agreement did from time to time turn over any sums to defendant Mary Ettinger.” By striking from item 7 the word “ such ” and substituting the word “ any.” By striking from item 8 the word “ various ” and substituting the word “ any.” By striking out item 11. As to items 1, 2, 5 and 9 the examination is limited to defendant Mary Ettinger. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 962, 27 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ettinger-v-ettinger-nyappdiv-1941.