Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America. Read the opinion of the Court — 266 A.D. 876 →
Opinion
In an action to recover accidental death and total disability benefits under a contract of insurance, order denying plaintiffs’ motion, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law the defense contained in paragraphs “ Fifth ” and “ Sixth ” of the answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America, 264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
264 A.D. 724 (Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.