Etter v. Dishman
145 S.W.2d 625
Opinion
The parties to this appeal have failed to file briefs and no excuse is offered or good cause shown for such failure.
Under the rules prescribed by the Supreme Court and the authorities on the subject we are authorized and obliged to dismiss this appeal. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., Tex.Com.App., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Etter v. Dishman, 145 S.W.2d 625 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).
145 S.W.2d 625 (Etter v. Dishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)