Etter v. Dishman
145 S.W.2d 625
This text of 145 S.W.2d 625 (Etter v. Dishman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Etter v. Dishman, 145 S.W.2d 625 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
The parties to this appeal have failed to file briefs and no excuse is offered or good cause shown for such failure.
Under the rules prescribed by the Supreme Court and the authorities on the subject we are authorized and obliged to dismiss this appeal. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., Tex.Com.App., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 S.W.2d 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etter-v-dishman-texapp-1940.