Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning
This text of 10 Teiss. 250 (Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
His Honor,
rendered tbe opinion and decree of tbe Court as follows:
This matter presents only two questions, both being of law.
Tbe first is, from what time does tbe lien for street paving in tbe City of New Orleans attach to tbe property, to-wit, whether upon tbe signing of tbe contract between tbe city and tbe paving contractor, or only upon tbe completion and acceptance of the work, and tbe issuance of a certificate therefor.
In Louisiana Improvement Co. vs. Macheca (3 Court of Appeal, p. 71), this Court held that tbe claim of the paving contractor though enforceable only upon registry (issuance) of bis certificate, is a complete burden on tbe [251]*251property, operating as a lien thereon, from the moment the contract between the city and the contractor was perfected (p. 77).
We adhere to the view therein expressed.
The other question is, whether an adjudication made at public auction by direction of the owner, and not under, an order of Court, is a perfected sale vesting title at once in the adjudicatee, or merely a promise of sale.
This precise point last arose in Collins vs. Demarest, 45 An., 114, and the Supreme Court there held that such an adjudication amounts only to a promise of sale and not to a completed sale vesting title in the purchaser.
We have but to follow that opinion as being the last expression of the Court bn that point.
The judgment appealed from is correct.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Teiss. 250, 134 La. 48, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etta-contracting-co-v-bruning-lactapp-1913.