Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning

10 Teiss. 250, 134 La. 48, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 71
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 19, 1913
DocketNo. 5824
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 10 Teiss. 250 (Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning, 10 Teiss. 250, 134 La. 48, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 71 (La. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

His Honor,

JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered tbe opinion and decree of tbe Court as follows:

This matter presents only two questions, both being of law.

Tbe first is, from what time does tbe lien for street paving in tbe City of New Orleans attach to tbe property, to-wit, whether upon tbe signing of tbe contract between tbe city and tbe paving contractor, or only upon tbe completion and acceptance of the work, and tbe issuance of a certificate therefor.

In Louisiana Improvement Co. vs. Macheca (3 Court of Appeal, p. 71), this Court held that tbe claim of the paving contractor though enforceable only upon registry (issuance) of bis certificate, is a complete burden on tbe [251]*251property, operating as a lien thereon, from the moment the contract between the city and the contractor was perfected (p. 77).

Opinion and decree, May 19th, 1913. Rehearing refused, June 23rd, 1913. Writ granted, October 13th, 1913 (134 La., 48).

We adhere to the view therein expressed.

The other question is, whether an adjudication made at public auction by direction of the owner, and not under, an order of Court, is a perfected sale vesting title at once in the adjudicatee, or merely a promise of sale.

This precise point last arose in Collins vs. Demarest, 45 An., 114, and the Supreme Court there held that such an adjudication amounts only to a promise of sale and not to a completed sale vesting title in the purchaser.

We have but to follow that opinion as being the last expression of the Court bn that point.

The judgment appealed from is correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deshotels v. Deshotels
427 So. 2d 20 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Arkla Industries, Inc. v. Hoag
214 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968)
Pettepher v. Pailet
172 So. 2d 337 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.
23 So. 2d 63 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1945)
Succession of Drouant
168 So. 517 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Frierson v. New York Life Ins. Co.
142 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)
Frierson v. New York Life Ins.
142 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)
Dover v. Atlas Assurance Co.
130 So. 828 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.
23 S.W.2d 1006 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1930)
Schoeffner v. Schoeffner
118 So. 890 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Capital Bldg. Loan Ass'n v. Northern Ins. Co. of N.Y.
116 So. 843 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Bailey v. Levy
104 So. 415 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Teiss. 250, 134 La. 48, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etta-contracting-co-v-bruning-lactapp-1913.