ETrade Bank v. Chadwick
This text of ETrade Bank v. Chadwick (ETrade Bank v. Chadwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000020 15-JUL-2014 10:14 AM
SCWC-13-0000020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
E*TRADE BANK, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BRUCE CHADWICK, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
and
BONNIE SUE CHADWICK; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; MOVADO GROUP, INC.; PUUNOA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000020; CIVIL NO. 09-1-0781(2))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Bruce Chadwick’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on June 3, 2014, is
hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 15,2014.
Gary Victor Dubin, Frederick J. Arensmeyer, and Zeina Jafar /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Robert E. Chapman and Mary Martin /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ETrade Bank v. Chadwick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etrade-bank-v-chadwick-haw-2014.